Legal Opinion

Pollin v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1998No. OTC 3812; SC S44044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The main issue in this case is how to value public property that is leased by a nonexempt lessee: Does ORS 307.110(1) (1995) 1 subject to taxation (a) the full value of the leased property, or (b) only the value of the leasehold interest? The Tax Court held that ORS 307.110(1) (1995) provides for taxation of the full value of the leased property. On taxpayer’s appeal, we affirm.

Taxpayer does not challenge the Tax Court’s factual findings. 2 Accordingly, we take these pertinent findings from the Tax Court’s opinion:

“The Port [of Portland (Port)] is a municipal corporation and operates a wide…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Swan Lake Moulding Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Swan Lake Moulding Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. RLK AND COMPANY v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Johnson v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SuppahOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Grant County Assr. v. Dayville Sch. Dist. 16j, Tc 4893 (or.tax 4-21-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
  5. State v. SuppahOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API