Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carlson v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. SC S44806 (Initiative 58); SC S44808 (Initiative 59); SC S44818 (Initiative 60); SC S44830 (Initiative 64); SC S44909 (Initiative 67)Published

(Cases consolidated for argument and opinion)

1ConcurrenceDurham, J.

I write separately because I agree with the majority’s decision to certify the Attorney General’s ballot titles in these cases, but I do not agree with all of its analysis of the interpretive problems posed by ORS 250.035(6).1 1 join in the majority’s suggestion that “[t]he legislature should revisit ORS 250.035(6) at its earliest opportunity,” 327 Or at 227 n 3, and offer these additional comments in the hope that they will assist the legislature in understanding the complexities of the problem that ORS 250.035(6) creates.

*228ORS 250.035(6) provides: “To avoid confusion, a ballot title shall not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API