Legal Opinion

State v. Ream

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 30, 1973No. 1 CA-CR 468PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

Defendants Jim Lee Ream and Conrad James Badt were convicted of the crime of possession of marijuana for sale, a felony, and received sentences of not less than two years nor more than five years in the Arizona State Prison.

Prior to trial the defendants filed, and the trial court denied, a motion to suppress certain evidence consisting of marijuana found in the automobile in which the defendants had been riding immediately prior to their arrest. The sole question raised on this appeal concerns the propriety of the denial of the motion to suppress. The pertinent facts are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Dennis Paul Lipton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. State v. TarasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. United States v. John Vincent Oswald, John Paul Ahlstrom, Raymond Gene Bublitz, William Orme CochraneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. John Lee BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. OchoaArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Miguel Angel Carrizoza-GaxiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. DeanArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. OchoaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API