Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Angel Carrizoza-Gaxiola

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1975No. 74-2968PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT,* District Judge. WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Carrizoza-Gaxiola was charged with transporting a stolen vehicle in foreign commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence gained from an allegedly illegal stop. The district court granted his motion and the government appeals. We affirm.

Carrizoza-Gaxiola was observed and then stopped by a team of federal and state law enforcement officers outside Nogales, Arizona. The purpose of this joint effort was to intercept vehicles stolen in the Phoenix and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bowen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. John Lee BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Robert Portsche WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Dennis Paul Lipton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Ross McCaleb and Brenda PageCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Francisco Hernandez-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Kevin L. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. United States v. Vidal Soto-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API