Legal Opinion

Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians v. Torres

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 29, 2002No. CV 01-01738 SVW AIJXPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians (the “Tribe”) seeks an order re quiring the removal and permanent exclusion by the United States Marshal of Defendant Vince Torres (“Torres”) and all of his personal property from the Santa Ynez Reservation (the “Reservation”). Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that there are no material issues of fact in dispute and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

As set forth below, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API