Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Lacey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1951No. 31798PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crampton

A decree of the chancellor of the superior court of Cook County denied to the plaintiffs-appellants the right to maintain a suit for partition of real estate, in which they claimed a one-half interest. The appeal is direct to this court, for a freehold is involved, as plaintiffs will either gain or lose such estate.

The facts were stipulated. Lucille Lacey and Walter Lacey, husband and wife, were joint tenants of the involved property. During their lifetime, a creditor of Walter Lacey reduced his claim to a judgment in the municipal court of Chicago, and a levy was made on the interest of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MuntzIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Van Antwerp v. HoranIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People Trust and Savings Bank v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Spadoni v. FrigoIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harms v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Eder v. RothamelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Maniez v. Citibank, F.S.B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. MERCHANTS NAT'L BK. OF AURORA v. OlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Raymond A. Flynn, Trustee of the Estate of Lillian M. Snoderly, Bankrupt v. Nancy Franklin O'DellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API