Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Muntz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1936No. 23674. Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remandedPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

E. P. Johnson and his wife, Edith P. Johnson, owned a tract of land in joint tenancy in the residence district of Elgin, improved by a single-dwelling house, which they occupied as a residence. The appellee, Muntz, obtained a judgment against E. P. Johnson for $4933.05 and costs. An execution was levied on Johnson’s interest in the property, and commissioners, appointed by the sheriff to appraise it, reported his interest was worth more than $1000, that the premises were not susceptible of division, and that the value of his undivided one-half interest was $6250. After statutory notice had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Capek v. KropikIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Leupold v. KrauseIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Taylor v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Lininger v. HelpenstellIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Voss v. RezgisIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Harms v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Vonville v. DexterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Van Antwerp v. HoranIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dixon v. MollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API