McKenzie v. Vandecar

This suit was brought to recover the purchase price of a stock of goods, which plaintiff asserted she sold to defendant, through her son, as her agent. Defendant asserted that he did not know the plaintiff *233in the transaction, but that he bought them from her son as his property, and that his contract of purchase was with the son,'and not the plaintiff. After the purchase, the defendant ha.d been garnished by the creditors of the son.

The error assigned is the admission of testimony showing that plaintiff paid nothing for the goods, and that, whatever the arrangements were between her and her…