United States v. Bovee
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Defendants pled guilty to a two-count Indictment involving marijuana, but they did not admit to the number of marijuana plants at issue. Instead, the parties have asked the Court — not a jury — to determine the number of marijuana plants for which Defendants will be held criminally liable. The Court has made that determination and, for the reasons set forth below, finds that the Government has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendants are guilty of (1) knowingly conspiring with each other to manufacture more than one hundred (100) marijuana…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Nancy Jo RebmannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Toby C. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BoveeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003