Legal Opinion

Shive v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1990No. 16016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Presiding Judge.

Movant Lyndall Shive appeals from an order of the trial court denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.151 motion to set aside a judgment and sentence for stealing. The conviction, based on a jury verdict, was affirmed by this court, State v. Shive, 620 S.W.2d 412 (Mo.App.1981).

Movant asserts that the contents of his motion entitled him to an evidentiary hearing, and the trial court erred in ruling otherwise, because his motion “alleged suf*327ficient facts not refuted by the record entitling movant to relief in that [the motion] sufficiently alleged that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Herrman v. DaffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Rayborn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API