Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Goguen
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 6, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17–40053–TSHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Of Decision
Background
Ray Dumas ("Dumas" or "Petitioner") has filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Docket No. 1)("Petition") alleging three grounds for relief. Specifically, Petitioner asserts the following claims in his Petition:1
Ground One: The Defendant's Federal Constitution Rights were violated when DNA Supervisor, Kerly Fenesan, was allowed to testify to work performed by criminalist Sherri Crook when Ms. *11Crook's Criminalistics Report was introduced at trial. This was contrary to and an unreasonable application of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ahmed v. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Charles C. Delaney III v. James MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bess v. FoyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020