Legal Opinion
In Re Fidelity Guarantee Mortgage Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 3, 1993No. 14-40219PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS
WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The facts presented by the parties underlying these motions are not in substantial dispute and are accepted by the Court as its findings of fact, except where otherwise noted.
Because of the expansive nature of the privilege claims made, and the impact those claims have on the administration of Debt- or’s estate, the Court will provide the parties with a detailed road map of the outer limits of the privilege asserted to guide any further discovery undertaken in this matter. 1 It is, of course, the claimants’ burden to establish…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. William H. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Megan-Racine Associates, Inc. (In Re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- In Re Gold & Appel Transfer S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006