Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Catour

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 16, 2004No. 3-02-0810PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

In this case we must determine whether an injured plaintiff may recover as damages the entire amount billed for medical services, or if she is limited to the discounted amount paid by her insurance carrier. We find that the rationale underlying the collateral source rule supports allowing recovery of the full amount billed.

Facts

Plaintiff Joyce Arthur alleged in her complaint that she fractured her leg after stepping in a hole on a farm owned by defendant Laurie Catour. Plaintiff was attending an auction at the farm which was conducted by Stenzel Brothers Auction Services, Inc. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Acuar v. LetourneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Koffman v. LeichtfussWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Arthur v. CatourIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Volunteers of America v. GardenswartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API