Legal Opinion
Hartford Insurance v. O'Mara
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 29, 2000No. CIV.A. 00-1326PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
This is a automobile insurance case involving a dispute over the proper procedure for applying for uninsured motorist (“UM”) and underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Plaintiff Hartford Insurance Company (“Hartford”) seeks a declaratory judgment affirming the validity of the UM/UIM selection form on which William and Elizabeth O’Mara (“the O’Maras”), parents of Defendant Steven O’Mara (“Defendant”), selected reduced UM/UIM coverage. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons below,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio v. Marcie Patterson. Marcie Patterson, Counter-Claimant v. Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio, Counter-Defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest v. AltomareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hartford Insurance v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002