Legal Opinion
ANDREWS v. MAY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01872Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAKIEM ANDREWS, : Plaintiff, Pro Se : CIVIL ACTION : □ GERALD MAY, No. 16-1872 Defendant : MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. DECEMBER 18, 2019 Hakiem Andrews claims that Gerald May, Warden of the Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility (““CFCF”), violated his constitutional rights by subjecting him to unsanitary, unsafe, and inadequate prison conditions—namely, housing three inmates in a cell built for two, a practice also known as “triple-celling.” In addition to this § 1983 prison conditions claim, Mr. Andrews asserts a claim…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.