State v. Dixon
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.
The State appeals from the order of the trial court sustaining Hal Dixon’s motion to suppress. In its sole point on appeal, the State asserts that the trial court erred in sustaining Mr. Dixon’s motion to suppress because the encounter between Corporal Eldon Grissom of the Missouri State Highway Patrol and Mr. Dixon was not a seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article 1, section 15 of the Missouri Constitution. The State contends that the circumstances surrounding the encounter between Corporal Grissom and Mr. Dixon would have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.