Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2008No. ED 90375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge.

Today we confront an issue that is hardly novel, but nevertheless merits a published opinion. We publish this opinion neither to establish new legal precepts nor to expand their reach, but rather to recount settled legal principles that obviously require repetition. Although we do not discourage law enforcement’s admirable efforts to interdict the transportation of illegal drugs, we remind them of the constitutional mandates that govern their conduct.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining Luconios L. Ross’s motion to suppress evidence…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. State v. WernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI v. JEFFREY BARKER STONE, Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. DIENSTBACHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Jewish Center for the Aged v. HaravitchMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State of Missouri v. Joe L. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API