Legal Opinion

South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Arnold

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1986No. 22466PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant South Carolina Public Service Authority appeals the award in these six consolidated condemnation actions. We reverse and remand.

These actions were commenced separately against respondents, six adjacent landowners. The landowners moved to consolidate the actions for trial and the motion was granted. Appellant filed a notice of intent to appeal. Respondents moved in this Court to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the consolidation order was interlocutory and not appealable. That motion was granted, and appellant filed a petition for rehearing and reconsideration.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Milhous v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. DingleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. McKinney v. Greenville Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Crout v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fibkins v. FibkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Woznicki v. MusickColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API