Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Hajecate

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1964No. 11145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This was ah action by appellant, an accommodation endorser, to recover money based upon a written promissory note, payable to the 1st National'Bánk of Ft. Smith, Arkansas^ executed'jointly and seVerally by' appellees' in Arkansas to be wholly performed in Arkansas'. Appellees defaulted. Appellant was' required to' pay- ánd was forced to bring this suit in Texas' iti order for the court to acquire jurisdiction over the defendants. The trial court granted ap-pellees’ motion for summary judgment on the pleadings, holding the action barred by Art. 5527, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.St,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Home Ins. Co. v. DickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. The Continental Supply Co. v. HutchingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Butler v. Merchants National Bank of MobileCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Smith v. GrimsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. LummisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Culpepper v. Daniel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Velde v. Swanson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API