Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert D. Stewart, Jr., AKA Robert Wilson Stewart, Bob Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2005No. 03-10662PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We are asked to determine whether certain words, spoken under certain circumstances, constitute criminal threats of harm against a federal judge and are not protected by the First Amendment. We are also asked to determine what quantum of evidence the Government must present to establish that a defendant, who solicited another person to murder a federal judge, had the required criminal intent for the other person to commit the murder.

FACTS

Robert D. Stewart, Jr. appeals his convictions and sentence for threatening to murder a federal judge (Count 1), soliciting the murder of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Edward CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Fogel v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. William WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Joshua R. KilbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. BagdasarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API