Legal Opinion

State v. Nambo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 3, 2012No. 100,464PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, C.J.:

Gabriel Nambo, Jr., pled guilty to aggravated robbery after he and two other individuals participated in the armed seizure of one vehicle and the attempted armed seizure of another vehicle. He now contends that the district court and Court of Appeals erred in requiring him to register under the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA) because the definition of an “offender” under K.S.A. 22-4902(a)(7) does not include unarmed accomplices such as himself.

*2We disagree and affirm the district court and the Court of Appeals on this issue of first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Halley v. BarnabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. Stuart and JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. In re W.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. DeCourcySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. PattilloSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. LeClairSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. City of Shawnee v. AdemSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API