Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ellis v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 4, 1944No. 36,228Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWedell, J.

I concur in the general principles of law stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 (c) of the syllabus and corresponding portions of the opinion but believe the first three paragraphs mentioned are inaccurately applied to the instant case. I dissent from parts (a) and (b) of paragraph 4 of the syllabus and corresponding portions of the opinion. My dissent from part (a) .of paragraph 4 and corresponding portions of the opinion is upon the ground the statute is not merely remedial in character but also disturbs substantive and substantial vested rights under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and express…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Boynton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API