Legal Opinion

Calabria v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 1982No. 82-141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Washington County Chancery Court declaring an ordinance of the city of Fayetteville to be valid. The decree specifically held that Fayetteville’s City Ordinance No. 1661, as amended, does not take or damage appellants’ property without just compensation and therefore is not in violation of Article 2 § 22 of the Arkansas Constitution. On appeal the appellants insist that Ark. Stat. Ann. § 76-2205 (Repl. 1981) and our decision in Arkansas State Highway Comm. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 231 Ark. 307, 330 S.W.2d 77 (1959), mandate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pulaski County Election Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Ark. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Ward v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Municipality of Helena-West Helena v. WeaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API