Legal Opinion

Fitzmaurice v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 29, 1999No. CIV. A. H-98-3095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

In this tax refund suit, the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs failure to file his administrative refund claim within the statutory period deprives this court of jurisdiction. Plaintiff, Michael Fitzmauriee (“Fitzmauriee”), has responded, urging that there is a fact issue as to when he received notice of the assessment that the IRS used to collect the payment that Fitz-maurice sues to recover.

Based on a review of the pleadings, the motion and response, the parties’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weisman v. CommissionerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API