Plunkett v. Parkin
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff claimed defendants breached an oral contract to dig a well on plaintiffs property because the water from the well was of insufficient quality and quantity. Following nonjury trial judgment was entered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
Here, plaintiff contends that the trial court’s judgment was against the weight of the evidence and the trial court erroneously applied the law “in that the plaintiff produced substantial evidence that the defendant first, contracted to produce a water well which would supply water of a good, useable quality and in sufficient quantities…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Young v. Ray America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robinson v. Estate of RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Looney v. Estate of EshlemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Centennial Insurance Co. v. International Motor Car Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re the Marriage of LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- White River Development Co. v. Meco Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lucas v. EnkvetchakulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Webb v. FinleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.