Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Ahern

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 31, 2023No. 3:19-cv-07423Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIEL GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-07423-JSC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY 9 v. LETTER BRIEFS 10 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 11 Defendants. 352, 353 12 13 The parties have submitted eight joint discovery letter briefs. (Dkt. Nos. 346, 347, 348, 14 349, 350, 351, 352, 353.) Oral argument is not required to resolve these disputes. See Civ. L.R. 7- 15 1(b). 16 1. Aramark’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories (Dkt. No. 346) 17 Plaintiffs seek…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Adair v. EQT Production Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API