Legal Opinion

Harker v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. Docket No. 15092-92UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS W. HARKER AND MARY HARKER, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Harker v. Commissioner

Docket No. 15092-92

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1994-583; 1994 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 598; 68 T.C.M. (CCH) 1272;

December 1, 1994, Filed

An appropriate order will be issued and decision will be entered under Rule 155.

For petitioners: Larry E. McKibben and Michael R. Horn.

For respondent: Mary Ann Waters and Jeffrey A. Schlei.

COLVIN

COLVIN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

COLVIN, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies and additions to tax for petitioners as follows:

Additions…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  4. Stone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Dennis Harker, Debtor. Dennis Harker v. United States of America (Acting Through the Internal Revenue Service)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Dennis Harker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API