Legal Opinion

McDanold v. McDanold

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1986No. S-915PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Nora McDanold appeals the trial court’s award of custody of Aileen McDanold to her ex-husband, Brad McDanold. At issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting sole custody of the couple’s child to Mr. McDanold. We affirm the trial court’s disposition since it did not abuse its discretion.

Child custody disputes are among the most difficult a trial court faces. Trial courts are, therefore, vested with broad discretion in determining where custody should be placed. Craig v. McBride, 639 P.2d 303, 304 (Alaska 1982); Horutz v. Horutz, 560…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Horutz v. HorutzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cyr v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Deivert v. OseiraAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Silvan v. AlcinaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API