Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Houghton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1860PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Marshall Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Susannah Houghton, the widow of James Houghton, deceased, brought her action in the Court below against the appellant, administrator of said decedent, to recover 300 dollars, which she claimed under the provisions of § 21 of the “Act regulating descents and the apportionment of estates,” 1 R. S. p. 251.

The defense set up was, in substance, that said Susan-nah, prior to her marriage with the decedent, was a widow, and had children by a former husband, and was possessed of property, real and personal, acquired by her former marriage, and the decedent was a widower having children by a former…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livingston v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Barnett v. GoingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Randall v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Buffington v. BuffingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Leach v. RainsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API