Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Gore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 20, 1932No. 31916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Pursuant to section 25 of article 7 of the Constitution of 1921, the judges composing the Second Division of the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit have requested instructions on a question of law arising in the ease of T. J. Caldwell and J. H. Nattin v. C. L. Gore, 1 No. 4206 of the docket of the court.

The judges of the Court of Appeal find and certify the following facts in the case, viz.:

“Plaintiffs and defendant own adjacent estates. Plaintiffs’ is in the State of Arkansas. Defendant’s is in the State of Louisiana.
“A natural, shallow drain or depression traverses plaintiffs’ land,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Taylor v. RudySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Morrow v. MerrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Stout Lumber Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Jackson v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Schmidt v. Driscoll Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. In Re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974District Court, C.D. California · 1975
  4. Caldwell v. GoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API