Rogelio Garcia v. Garau Germano Hanley & Pennington, P.C.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Rogelio Garcia appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Garau Germano Hanley & Pennington, P.C. (“GGHP”). He asserts that GGHP breached the parties’ contract for legal representation and that the manner in which GGHP collected its fee under the contract broke the law. We affirm.
ISSUE
Garcia raises two issues, which we consolidate and restate as: whether the trial court erred in granting GGHP’s motion for summary judgment. 1
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Garcia’s then-wife, Renee Garcia, gave birth to their child in May 2001.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare SystemIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Vincennes University by the Board of Trustees of Vincennes v. Daniel E. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John D. May v. Erik C. Allen (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016