Elsag Bailey, Inc. v. City of Detroit, Mich.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Fed.R. Civ.P.12 (b)(6))
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I.Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction in this case is based on diversity of citizenship; the parties are completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Application of Michigan law to the facts is required. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938).
II.Holding
In this opinion I hold that the doctrine of governmental immunity 1 bars plaintiff Elsag Bailey’s (Bailey) common law tort claims against defendant City of Detroit (the City).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007