Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Quaker City Cab Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1924No. Appeal, 169-170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained by the wife, while a passenger in a taxicab of the defendant company, alleging that such injuries resulted from the negligence of the driver of the cab. They recovered judgments in the court below and the defendant appeals. The only assignment of error refers to the refusal of the court below to enter judgment in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto.

The testimony would have warranted a finding of the following facts: The cab in which the plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cody v. VenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Carr v. FaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Brooks v. Sun Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. O'Brien v. Public Service Taxi Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API