Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lewis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1990No. 89-1181Published

1Dissent

The majority has granted the writ of mandamus in this case and has ordered the trial judge to disburse funds deposited in an interpleader action, even though there remains in the case the question of whether the trial judge was correct in dismissing the health insurance carrier's subrogation claim on the ground that the federal courts had exclusive jurisdictionof the subrogation claim because of the determination that the welfare benefit plan was one regulated by the Employees Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

The majority, although agreeing with me "that the trial court erred…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API