Legal Opinion
Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Esso Camden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
Both parties have excepted to the report of the Commissioner, Thomas H. Middleton, Esq., fixing damages due as a result of a joint fault collision between their vessels. All other matters having been stipulated, the items in controversy relate to damages for detention of both vessels and the recovery by the libellant of certain general average disbursements.
The collision occurred in Chesapeake Bay on November 2, 1946. The Halsted was outward bound from Baltimore for the Baltic, the Camden inbound for Baltimore from Baytown, Texas, and Sew-ell’s Point, Virginia. After the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Apollon.Supreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atkins v. Alabama Drydock & Shipbuilding CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1960
- Nicodemisen v. O/S/F/V DartmouthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
- Cliff, Jr., Inc. v. M. V. Captain WillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Oliver J. Olson & Co. v. The American Steamship Marine LeopardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Compania Punta Alta, S.A. v. DalzellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.