Legal Opinion

Bosserman v. Ettline

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County

Decided December 8, 1952No. 92Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, P. J.,

After the jury’s verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiffs filed motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony, defendant moved for *460a compulsory nonsuit which was refused by the court, and subsequently filed a written point for binding instructions which was also refused by the court. Plaintiffs filed a written point for binding instructions which was also refused.

At the argument on the above motions before the court en banc, plaintiffs did not insist upon their motion for judgment n. o. v. but limited their argument to a motion for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ogilvie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Dixon's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. D'Ambrosio v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Samuelson v. SherrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Feldman v. RiccordinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API