Legal Opinion

Williams v. Petty

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 20, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The circuit court was right in holding that the plaintiffs were not entitled to maintain the action. The action of forcible entry and unlawful detainer lies only in the cases pointed out by the statute, and the main purpose of the statute is to give a speedy remedy to a landlord against his tenant, who holds possession without right.

In this case the facts do not show that the plaintiffs were ever in the possession of the land, or that the defendant held under them by virtue of any contract, or that the relation of landlord and tenant in any manner, express…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Necklace v. WestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Cherry v. KirklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Dortch v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  4. White River Land & Timber Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Stamps v. Brown-EppsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API