Legal Opinion

E.A.R. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 30, 2009No. SC08-506PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal has certified conflict between its decision in E.A.R. v. State, 975 So.2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), and the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in M.S. v. State, 927 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). See E.A.R., 975 So.2d at 613; see also A.T. v. State, 983 So.2d 679, 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (certifying conflict on the same issue), notice invoking discretionary review filed, No. SC08-1159 (Fla. June 12, 2008). We now exercise our discretionary jurisdiction to resolve this inter-district impasse. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The precise issue…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. System Components Corp. v. Florida Deparment of TransportationSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. M.J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API