Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1958No. 30,029Published

1DissentWoodley, Judge

There is evidence in this record to sustain a finding that appellant had earning capacity and, before landing in jail in Oklahoma, worked fifteen days for which he received $15.52 a day; that he had $146.81 when he was placed in jail after paying $65 down on an automobile.

In the same letter in which he admitted having this $146.81 he wrote his wife regarding support for the children. Referring to a communication from his father-in-law, appellant said in his letter: “He said I would not see you or the kids, and if I didn’t want to get sued, to be damn sure and keep up on my support. Well, you…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte LoganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Ex parte BeethCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Cardona v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Rainwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Ex Parte BarrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API