Legal Opinion

Haire v. Brooks

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1938No. 4409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of appellant’s intestate by defendant, in the operation of his automobile on a public highway in this state.

At the conclusion of appellant’s testimony the court sustained a motion of the appellee for an instructed verdict in his favor. This motion called for a declaration of law, viz.: Considering the testimony of plaintiff, together with all ■reasonable inferences that could bé drawn therefrom, in a light most favorable to him; had he made a case that would support a judgment? Silva v. Waldie, 42 N.M. 514,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silva v. WaldieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Caviness v. Driscoll Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stover v. StovallSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. R. & L. Transfer Co. v. State Ex Rel. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Cavanaugh v. BlaumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Clark v. CassettyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ferran v. JacquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Moss v. AcuffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API