English v. Matowitz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The petitioner claims that since the Pennsylvania indictments charge him with having committed the offenses in Pennsylvania while he was in the city of Cleveland, he is not a fugitive from justice of the state of Pennsylvania and, therefore, is not subject to extradition to that state. In this claim the petitioner relies on the provisions of Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution of the United States, which reads in part as follows:
“A person charged in any state with treason, felony, or other.'crime, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another state-, shall, on demand of the execu…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Illinois Ex Rel. McNichols v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Gildar v. KrissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- In Re MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- In re Complaint in Habeas Corpus of RoweOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Cooper v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.