Legal Opinion

Hass v. City of Kirkland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1971No. 41332PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The appellant, Robert Hass, the owner of lakefront property, is seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, City of Kirkland, to issue a building permit for a 34-unit apartment building. The respondent has refused to issue the permit on the grounds that the proposed structure would violate section 6.4, chapter 6, of ordinance No. 1140 of the city of Kirkland. This section was originally enacted by the Kirkland city council on March 7, 1966, as ordinance No. 1028 and reads as follows:

An ordinance of the City of Kirkland relating to fire protection and prevention, and prescribing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hull v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API