Blum v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore, (Wickes, J.)
1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.
The appellants, together with one Isaac Harris, were indicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore City for conspiring “by means of divers false pretences and representations, and other false and subtle means and devices to obtain and acquire unto themselves certain properties, moneys, goods and chattels,” of certain corporations and persons named in the indictment, and of certain other persons to the jurors unknown, of the value of $2,500, and to cheat and defraud such persons and corporations. A bill of particulars as to Samuel Blum was demanded and filed. The traversers pleaded “not guilty,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
- Hawthorn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.