Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Haynes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 25, 1957No. 12124PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
241 F.2d 417
Albert J. FITZGERALD, individually and as representative of
the members of the United Electrical, Radio &
Machine Workers, of America (UE), Appellant,
v.
Norman HAYNES, Matthew Shelly, John Mapstone, Vanetta Groce,
Marian Hart, Jean Johnson, Hazel Frederick, Rex
Greeley, Earl Caton, Ruth Ohl, Freda
Schwenkmeyer, Benjamin Riskin,
and Alfred Ellis.
No. 12124.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 21, 1957.
Decided Feb. 15, 1957.
Rehearing Denied March 25, 1957.
David Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C. (Martin R. Bradley, Jr., Buffalo,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Green v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Crawford v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958