Wilson Leasing Co. v. Seaway Pharmacal Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partR. B. Burns, P. J.
Seaway Pharmacal Corporation (hereinafter Seaway), corporate defendant herein, obtained *363numerous pieces of office and manufacturing equipment from Wilson Leasing Company (hereinafter Wilson). The equipment was obtained in four distinct lots, each the subject of a distinct, but identical, five-year lease.1 The two larger leases were personally guaranteed by the individual defendants herein. All four leases were defaulted. After some extensions and a few payments by two of the guarantors, Wilson took possession of all the equipment, sold it, applied the proceeds to the balance due on each…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Springstead v. Crawfordsville State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Locke v. McVeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Almand v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Hoehner v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.