Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Wilson Leasing Co. v. Seaway Pharmacal Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1974No. Docket 15250Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partR. B. Burns, P. J.

Seaway Pharmacal Corporation (hereinafter Seaway), corporate defendant herein, obtained *363numerous pieces of office and manufacturing equipment from Wilson Leasing Company (hereinafter Wilson). The equipment was obtained in four distinct lots, each the subject of a distinct, but identical, five-year lease.1 The two larger leases were personally guaranteed by the individual defendants herein. All four leases were defaulted. After some extensions and a few payments by two of the guarantors, Wilson took possession of all the equipment, sold it, applied the proceeds to the balance due on each…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Springstead v. Crawfordsville State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Locke v. McVeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Almand v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Hoehner v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API