Legal Opinion
Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1934No. 14980PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
Howard Estes brings this suit seeking monetary redress for physical injuries sustained by him when he slipped and fell while walking on the brick pavement in the courtyard, or patio, which afforded access to the rear door of an apartment leased by him from Miss Alberta ICinsey, defendant.
He charges that he slipped because of the accumulation of mud and slime on the surface of the bricks and that he himself was not at fault.
The defenses relied upon are:(1) A denial that there was any defect in the surface of the pavement.(2) A denial that there is any duty placed by the laws of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klein v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Wise v. LavigneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Ciaccio v. CarbajalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bates v. BlitzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Wilson v. VirgademoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Pollard v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Thiel v. KernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.