Legal Opinion
United States v. an Article of Drug . . . Neoterramycin Soluble Powder Concentrate
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided December 14, 1981No. Civ. A. CA-3-79-0615-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
Came on for consideration before the Court, Honorable Robert M. Hill, presiding, the motion to dismiss filed by Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer), claimant. Having considered the motion, briefs of the parties, and oral argument the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied.
The plaintiff, the United States, initiated this in rem action by filing a complaint for forfeiture seeking seizure and condemnation of a specified quantity of the animal drug Neo-Terramycin Soluable Powder Concentrate (Neo-Terramycin) which had been shipped in interstate commerce by…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Liner v. Jafco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 4,680 Pails, More or Less, Each Pail Containing 60 Packets, Etc., Pfizer, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- United States v. an Article of Drug ... Neo-Terramycin Soluble Powder ConcentrateDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1982