Legal Opinion
Remick v. Manfredy
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1999No. 2:99-mc-00025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss this action for lack of in personam jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (6). Alternatively, they argue that venue in this district is improper and request that this matter be transferred to the Northern District of Illinois.
History of the Case
The plaintiff, Lloyd Remick, is an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with “a national practice specializing in sports and entertainment law.” (Pi’s Complaint, ¶…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, AustriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Wolk v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Remick v. ManfredyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Remick v. ManfredyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001