Congress Bar & Restaurant, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Fundamentally, appellants attack the trial court for both an error in law in determining that under the policies the respondent is given “a choice” to rebuild, repair, or replace the property damaged in the fire, and an error in its factual determination that a period of eleven months was “necessary for the plaintiff to rebuild and restore the damaged premises.” These are two of the three issues presented on this appeal. The third, raised by respondent’s motion to review, is whether the respondent is entitled to prejudgment interest from the date of the fire.
Policy Interpretation.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Necedah Manufacturing Corp. v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Maslow Cooperage Corp. v. Weeks Pickle Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- California Wine Asso. v. Wisconsin Liquor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Amusement Syndicate Co. v. Prussian National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Duane Reade Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Afram Export Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.