Legal Opinion
State v. Larson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1984No. C9-83-1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The state appeals an order for suppression of evidence seized and statements made by defendant at the time of the search. The trial court ordered suppression because the officers did not have a search warrant and did not give the defendant a Miranda warning before questioning him or searching his living room. We reverse.
FACTS
Rick Johnson’s home was burglarized on August 24, 1983. A television and a set of knives were taken. Johnson informed police that the night before the break-in defendant Kevin Larson had been to his home and had expressed an interest in the television.
O…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. GardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. L'ITALIENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. GardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.